Monday, September 18, 2006

Stage Pianos / Performance Synthesizers

For the record, I started my first keyboarding article with the notion of solving the musical equivalent of world hunger in one shot – from to choosing a keyboard to choosing sounds to technique to phasing issues… so what you're getting here is roughly less than a tenth of what I had outlined. I just couldn't short change the depth of information here when this blog is supposed to be about getting into the details of music ministry. I just can't put out another Cliff's Notes® version of these things – those are already out there. Oh the joys of being a new, amateur, make-believe journalist (more commonly just called a "blogger").

I am a pianist by trade, and guitarist and whatever else by necessity, so I feel very at home when it comes to keyboards, piano and the like. There are lots of great things you can do with piano and keyboards, but I'll just take the time to scratch the surface of keyboards, playing and sound issues you've probably encountered. I've met some experienced keyboardists that weren't quite sure how to deal with some of these issues, and I hope these are a help to you.

Types of keyboards

There are a few genres of keyboards out there. Your local bookseller's periodical racks have entire magazines dedicated to help you figure out how best to part with your hard-earned money on their advertiser's products. I realize there are tons more models and hybrids of all sorts of keyboards available, including rack mount synths and software synths. No matter what you do, you need some way to interact and generate sound using some type of keyboard playing device. Here's how I'd break down the basic types of physical, hardware based keyboards on the market today:

  • Performance synths / Digital Pianos (Yamaha S-series, Roland RD series)
    Music workstations (Roland Fantom series, Korg Triton series, Yamaha Motif series)
  • Analog synthesizers / emulators (ex. Nord Lead series, Korg RADIAS, Roland SH-201, microKorg)
  • Vintage Synths (Yamaha DX7, Roland D-50, Korg M-1, Sequential Circuits Prophet-5, MiniMoog, ARP 2600)
  • Vintage Keyboards (Hammond B3, Wurlitzer 200A, Mellotron Mark IV, Fender Rhodes 73)
  • Vingate keyboard emulators (Nord Electro series, Korg CX-3, Roland VK-8)
  • Controllers (Yamaha KX series, Roland A-series, M-Audio Axiom / Oxygen)

Portable keyboards (Yamaha PSR series – virtually anything with speakers)
Every one of these above types of keyboards has a purpose in mind from its inception, and certain keyboards are going to be more apt toward worship than others, but virtually all can be used in some way, if done correctly. Each one of these types of synths warrants an entire article unto themselves. This time around, we'll delve into digital stage pianos and performance synths.
Piano-based keyboard overview

For the worship team looking for the best, most flexible, useful keyboards for the worship team, these keyboards are the total opposite end of the spectrum from the specific use sounds of the analog modeling synthesizer. These keyboards typically lack workstation features like sequencers, sampling, and sound programmability, and concentrate of great instrument playability.
Piano emulation
These keyboards tend to excel primarily at their piano sounds. What makes these keyboards better sounding than others with their piano sounds is primarily how much of the machine's memory and digital signal processing (DSP) power is dedicated to recreating an accurate, expressive representation of a piano.

First of all, the piano must be multi-sampled. Multi-sampled instrument have recordings of their sounds taken from more than one pitch from the original instrument. In addition, they can have samples taken from more than one volume of the instrument being recorded. Today's best piano multi-samples have a minimum of three velocity (volume) levels recorded for every key on the piano. That's a minimum of 264 samples just for the piano sound! Traditionally, all the best piano samples had come from the industry standard Yamaha C7 grand piano. In the past two years or so, this has changed dramatically with manufacturers looking into less standard, but no less important and powerful grand pianos – specifically, the Steinway concert grand pianos. When I first heard the Roland RD-700SX, I was so moved by the dramatic sound of the Steinway samples over the Yamaha C7 I'd been hearing for years and years, I very soon afterward bought the RD-700SX.

The second, recent innovation around piano recreation is the DSP modeling of the piano's soundboard. The soundboard is the big, cast iron piece that suspends the strings inside the piano, and allows the string to resonate. The modeling for the soundboard includes control of the damper noise, sympathetic string resonance (when you hit an "E", the "E" strings above it also make a sound if the dampers are lifted, in addition to other strings, like the "B" and "A" strings to a lesser extent). It will also add an air of… well… AIR to the sound of the piano, using reverberation models not unlike those that model a small room – which is what the inside of a piano essentially is.

Third, is the keyboard action. With these keyboards, you will (in a way) get what you pay for. When playing keyboards of this type in the store, you will notice a distinct difference in the mechanical action of each of these keyboards as you go from the moderately priced models to the higher end models. The question is always, "what's going to work for you?" not necessarily, "what can you afford?" There is no doubt, the hammer action of the higher end boards is superb. It was another major factor in the purchase of my Roland RD-700SX over her less-expensive sister, the RD-300SX. The 300 is much lighter, but doesn't have the great hammer action, and so I sacrifice my back on occasion for a great feel! (Thank goodness I bought a case with wheels!)

Lastly, you'll want to pay attention to these finer points, which are often included on non-stage piano keyboards (but not all). For example: are the top strings affected by the damper pedal? (On all real pianos, they are not affected.) Also, in the last 7 years or so, manufacturers have paid attention to so-called "half-damping". This is when the damper pedal is neither all the way up nor down. This can include things like muting the strings, but un-damping them again before they have stopped resonating, allowing them to be sustained again. Or it can include partial damping of the strings with the pedal partially depressed as the string sustains.

More than just a piano
Beyond the piano sounds, many models include many goodies that make purchasing them unique, and would require careful consideration before purchase. First of all, there is the inclusion of over, useful sounds. Many stage pianos of old (and some current) only include a few sounds, mostly simple organ sounds, electric piano sounds and string-like sounds. In general, this may be all you need. Others may include more exotic organ generation engines (like the Roland RD-700SX or the Clavia Stage88). The Stage88 doesn't contain hundreds of sounds like the RD-700SX or S-90ES, but it does have fantastic Hammond, Wurlitzer, and Rhodes emulations, including full digital drawbars and great amp simulation! The RD-700SX has great capabilities as a multi-device MIDI controller, while the Yamaha S90ES, unlike the other two, is a fully programmable PCM-based synthesizer, able to save your patch settings, and program altogether new sounds.

What's right for you?
The first three models I have listed at the end of this article all have three things in common: great piano multi-samples (coming from Steinway and Yamaha grand pianos), soundboard DSP, and half damping. The other critical things I would listen to when choosing a keyboard that works for you: consider what other sounds you really need, what kind of control you really need, how does the keyboard feel to you, and how does the midrange of the piano sound to you? This last point, like the others, is totally a judgment call. The piano's range right around middle "C", the most used, useful and critical part of the piano's sound, is also one of the most difficult to reproduce in a keyboard instrument. Only your personal taste can determine what's right for you and your ears' perception of expressiveness.

One more thing in this area, and this is very important for worship musicians: How does the piano and the other sounds sound when mixed MONO?! Every time you plug into a system for playing live, if you aren't doing it already, you should in virtually ALL cases, be playing in mono, not stereo. This is because of the nature of stereo – it uses out of phase sounds in the listeners ears to recreate the sound of the real instrument by having the sounds be different in each ear. In a live situation, the position of the listener is for all but one or two people, never in the optimal position for a stereo sound. In fact, it is virtually always never optimal (or even good) for stereo. The music stores I frequent always have stereo speakers set-up near the keyboard for sale, or have headphones. A keyboard may sound great in the store in stereo, but get it plugged into the front-of-house, and you might as well be playing a Casio SK-1. (Please, just nod and say you know what that is.) This is because the listener is not positioned between the speakers, is hearing reflections off walls… any number of things happens live that will make your great-sounding, expensive stereo keyboard sound stale and cheap. You must have your keyboard set-up to output a mono sound, like that from a single speaker amp, or the mix of the entire band, and the sound of your keyboard will suffer from problems such as comb filtering and phase cancellation, otherwise known to the more novice reader – lousy sound.

I know I've touted the Roland RD-700SX. Mine has personally been used live by the likes of recording artists Kenny White and Matt Maher when they've visited the Seattle area. However, if I were to make this purchase again now, I'd give the Stage88 and the S90ES a serious listen to, since they weren't available when I bought my RD-700SX.

If you're looking for a lower-cost, bare-bones solution that can still sound good in a sound system, you may also want to look at the M-Audio line of stage pianos. Their piano sounds are reportedly good. I can't say that I've actually tried them out myself.
Models to check out: Roland RD-700SX, Yamaha S90ES, Clavia Stage88, M-Audio ProKeys 88, Roland VX-88 (discontinued)

May God bless you in His endeavors to minister to his people through you.

Monday, September 11, 2006

Resources for the resourceful

I'm just going to list a few of the great resources I've used over the years that have helped me in my music ministry. As this blog grows, I'll be citing many of these references.

Next week, we'll discuss keyboards in music ministry – an area close to my heart.

Publications



Web Sites:



Conferences / Organizations



Non-Christian based sources worth reading:



  • Performing Songwriter – Monthly magazine
  • Sound On Sound – Great magazine for the advanced musician and amateur recording engineer
  • Confessions of a Record Producer – Moses Avalon

Copyright © 2006 by Arthur C. Leonard, 10936 157th Ct. NE, Redmond, WA 98052. All rights reserved. No portion of this article may be reproduced without the expressed written permission of the author or his assignees.

Tuesday, September 5, 2006

Planning a sing-able liturgy – vocal range

Since this is my first article, I'm going to give a little background here. When dealing with planning liturgies, you should plan music around several things:



  • Christ focused

  • Relevant to the action of the liturgical rite

  • Relevant to the teaching / readings of the day

  • Full, active, and conscious participation

This article will pertain specifically to the last point: full, active and conscious participation. A lot of the parameters going into making a decision about how to approach this will depend greatly on the collective state of the assembly you serve. Therefore the tips below may serve as a guide, but only you and your liturgical ministry can determine their relevance to your liturgy.


Let's consider a song I think is one of the more common offenders when it comes to conventional congregational vocal range: "Did You Feel the Mountains Tremble" by Martin Smith. I've heard LIFE TEEN and worship bands do this song, and they tend to perform it well, and the people do enjoy the song. When I ask those who were there if they could sing with it, they almost universally respond, "Not really, but I like to listen." If you look at the song as written, the range of the song easily exceeds the range of the congregation, soaring all the way to an "F#" an octave above middle "C"! Martin Smith has a lovely tenor voice that can really soar beautifully with this song, but this becomes hard, if not impossible to follow for the less vocally trained.
Unfortunately this misses the point of a full, active and conscious participatory liturgy. It is not enough for the music ministers to act on behalf of the community, but rather the congregation must participate, as mandated by the Catechism –


Mother Church earnestly desires that all the faithful should be led to that full, conscious, and active participation in liturgical celebrations which is demanded by the very nature of the liturgy, and to which the Christian people, "a chosen race, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, a redeemed people," have a right and an obligation by reason of their Baptism.1


We, as music ministers, must choose songs that enable all to participate in their role in the mass, not just observers, but holy participants in union with the Holy Spirit. Our job is to support the assembly, not supplant it with just superior musicianship.


Vocal Range of the Assembly


I will assume here that the reader is dealing with a Catholic congregation. Some congregations can get behind songs with a wide mantissa (vocal range from low to high notes), but in general Catholic assemblies have a more narrow range that our Protestant brethren in Christ. I follow a few simple guidelines when selecting music or adjusting the key of a particular song, enabling all, not just your congregational tenors and sopranos to sing!

In practice, I've found my congregation's range is limited to what you see above – a "B" below middle "C", to a "D" one octave above middle "C". You'll notice, this is a very narrow range. Most every singer has a range of at least an octave and a half, with some, more gifted singers sporting over three octaves. I can sometimes get away with an "Eb" or a low "A", but if those notes are sustained at least one person will let me know they had difficulty after mass.


In Protestant congregations, it is not uncommon to find a wider range – "A" below middle "C" to an "E" an octave above, with some select songs as high as an "F".


This totally reminds me of my role in "Brigadoon" back in high school. I played the part of "Charlie Dalrymple", the local boy about to get married. The song "I'll Go Home with Bonnie Jean", has one note that was a "G" an octave above middle "C". (If you've heard the song, you know the note on the key lyric, "I'll… "). After having sung baritone for three years, I had to exercise my newly discovered tenor voice to hit that note. As it turned out, I was really a tenor 1 in hiding, and after some work, this was no longer a problem.


Your congregation does not have the same luxury of vocal lessons, practice and patience. We as music ministers need to engage them here and now, and to do that, we can't exclude them and their perceptively lazy voices through our selection of music.


This means picking songs that fit the range of the congregation (sometimes at the exclusion of other, otherwise good songs), adjusting the keys of songs we love to sing, and making sure we lead where the congregation actually sings.


It goes without saying that when leading an assembly, it is best to lead in the range they are expected to sing in. This means your altos and lower tenors will get more exercise leading in church since they tend to represent the average assembly singer's range. A soprano leading the congregation may be sometimes more difficult. I'll cover things like this in future articles, but include as little vibrato as you tastefully can. It encourages participation rather than passive listening.


Conclusion


There is a lot that can be said about leading the assembly, and if you'll allow my long-winded explanations to continue, I'll write more on this in the future. The basic idea is lead them where you want them to go, and where they can be lead. We should not be passive in our worship, just as no other of our brethren present, acting in unity with the Body of Christ, should remain silent in worship.


Thank you for reading, and God bless you.


References
1 Catholic Catechism, 1141